One video compares the sound of the shutter to the the M-E. Jump to content . I could get myself in position where something was about to happen, use the rangefinder or live-view to pick a point of focus, then whilst looking at the back of the camera I could use my peripheral vision to judge the timing of whatever I was taking a photo of whilst maintaining focus confirmation.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_17',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); I do this all the time with the Sony cameras, yet had never joined the dots and worked out that it might be something Id enjoy or find use for with a rangefinder. Don't be one of those people who blows their budget on a body and can barely afford to buy a lens or two. Just feels like the marketing department have taken over the machine room, unfortunately. As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason . I cant. Leica claims it uses different technology, whatever that means. Use your experience to help others in the community make a decision. Leica has used the button space on the rear of the camera that is used for live view in the Typ 240 to add direct access to the white balance feature. To be honest, I think I shared those views and though I might not been inclined to articulate them quite as vociferously as some it was those views that swayed me toward the M262. I admit, Im a bit of a snob with stills cameras. The Leica M9/ M8 B&W JPEGs can be created 95-99% in camera and I would say my black and white film images are 88% in camera/film developing, 2% scanning, 10% in computer to remove dust and do any basic darkroom style adjustments. People get all gnarled up about refresh rates and such, but the M240s EVF is fine for its limited uses.Focus Peaking. The Digital Leica M Samples Gallery (Any digital M from M8 to M-D 262) Below are all images taken with a digital Leica M from the 240 to the m_P to the M-D, the latest and greatest M Rangefinders from Leica Camera. I find it very quick. I currently have a q which is a lot of fun but I'm more interested in a rangefinder at this point. (Leica M (Typ 262)), Unknown. Forget is a strong word. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. Display as a link instead, I have had good luck with Sonys latest fast SD cards, improving this condition quite well. In this buying guide weve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best. Lastly, its kind of neat that these two are sort of a match- but different enough to stand out on my desk when I go to grab one for a shoot. You cannot paste images directly. And if you find the viewfinder better, as many report. Heres some photos: Bear in mind, these have been taken with a load of different lenses:if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-leader-3','ezslot_21',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-3-0'); if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-leader-2','ezslot_20',190,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-2-0'); In conclusion, the Leica M262 is a fantastic camera with a great interface with very few issues worth picking holes in. Sadly, that is the way of digital cameras my friend, a never-ending hamster wheel of upgrades. . Also for helping critical focus wide open at close distance. Completely agree I really thought thats what they were going to do. As cboy pointed out above, that may limit lens choice. With the wrong card, the wait before the shutter is again available is bad. Its marquee features are omissions rather than additions: the M-D doesn't . Another M10 fetish. The shutter and cocking mechanism are much quieter than in the earlier and higher-priced M Typ 240, and allow two frames per second to be recorded in single shot mode. Here is a quickreview and comparison for the Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 rangefinder cameras. Any chance youre planning to do a write up on that Nokton 50mm f/1.2? I didnt discover this, despite that being how the M9 works. The maximum resolution available for videos shot with the main camera. Of course they can, but you have them. In short, I generally find myself not needing to tweak the colours at all from the M262, which is something I quite appreciate. I have an M246 where just holding down the ISO button, turning the thumbwheel to change it then releasing does the job. Ive had it for years and purchased it when M8s were at their lowest prices. I missed his musings in AP. With less than full coverage, you may have to crop your photos afterward to get them looking perfect. Funnily enough, when searching to find out if I was the only one to notice this, I found this post on a forum where someone finds the same issue, but prefers the cooler screen of his Leica M240 to the later M-P version of the M240 which seems to have the same warmer screen as my M262. Ive got a 262 and I really like the fact that its completely stripped back to just the basics. I think either will be a fine way into a Leica. If zinc is your preference the M6 is your baby. This is a useful feature for me that I enjoyed using the Fuji system which had a great focus peaking aid. This isnt me highlighting something bad though, it makes no difference to anything really. Great review as always, I look forward to the M10 review I think the slimmer body size alone is a reason to upgrade, feel like a proper M body. To seethedifference between Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 cameras we have put together Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 specs comparison tablebelow. Can you compare side by side, please? This never really bothered me about the M9, but having the issue taken away made me appreciate the issue for what it was. An indicator shows you when the device has low battery. I prefer live view for wider lenses to an external viewfinder. Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. Another M10 fetish is better performance at high ISO. This is an inspiring and generous website. Early M3 models featured a double-stroke lever, meaning it required two strokes to advance to the next frame of film and cock the shutter. I was wondering if you ever ended up upgrading to the M10? Both were taken at 3200 ISO to try and exaggerate any image quality issues. Using the right SD card is key here. No. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. I love the colors from the sensor as a whole, but one thing I dont like is rendering of skin tones. The SET and the ISO buttons are much more useful though to be honest, I personally dont even use the stuff in the set menu either. I just dont shoot it at that high ISO for it to be a problem, and often wonder what on earth people are doing with their cameras to need the sorts of high ISOs that get spoken about it reviews. by Charles Higham, https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, https://www.35mmc.com/14/10/2017/fuji-x100f-fuji-lost-sight-elegant-original-concept/, A Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM Distagon Review - An Optical Wonder! And thats pushing it. It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come., [] a moment to reflect on this previous style of photography of mine. ins.style.display='block';ins.style.minWidth=container.attributes.ezaw.value+'px';ins.style.width='100%';ins.style.height=container.attributes.ezah.value+'px';container.appendChild(ins);(adsbygoogle=window.adsbygoogle||[]).push({});window.ezoSTPixelAdd(slotId,'stat_source_id',44);window.ezoSTPixelAdd(slotId,'adsensetype',1);var lo=new MutationObserver(window.ezaslEvent);lo.observe(document.getElementById(slotId+'-asloaded'),{attributes:true}); The fact is, I really like them as cameras, but largely speaking they just function for me. This screen has very good focus peaking and an exposure waveform overlay that I find invaluable! Yes, the image quality of the Leica M (type 240) is a step down from the Leica M9. A fetish with the M10 is its simplified menu. As I don't need money selling them "cheap", I'm happy to keep them all for what they are, using each one equally. Its just become a reason not to use the screen as much as I might have. The better screen, slightly improved interface and even fairly small things like the artificially lit frame lines introduced in the M240 made the the camera feel more mature. In one of his editorial pieces in Amateur Photographer he applauds this philosophy. As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason I went for the M262 instead of the M240 when I was looking to replace my M9. A few more differences - Leica M10 vs Leica M240. Actually, a large part of this is because they dont often inspire me to write about them whilst I own them, yet I hate to see them go without doing them the justice of sharing a few thoughts.var cid='8222364248';var pid='ca-pub-7054871687658000';var slotId='div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0';var ffid=1;var alS=1002%1000;var container=document.getElementById(slotId);container.style.width='100%';var ins=document.createElement('ins');ins.id=slotId+'-asloaded';ins.className='adsbygoogle ezasloaded';ins.dataset.adClient=pid;ins.dataset.adChannel=cid;if(ffid==2){ins.dataset.fullWidthResponsive='true';} Whats cool about having a Z6 (or other similar mirrorless camera) is that I can easily adapt the Leica M glass. If you want video and live view, get the 240. A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. More humble pie for me! Something about the idea that it had all these weird and wonderful features made me expect a camera that felt different. I will investigate that. Compared to when I shot with any other camera system, my gut feeling is I come away with fewer shotsless spray and pray . Of course, Id skipped the M240 and gone from M9 to M262 though surprisingly, the menu system of the M262 is even more stripped back than that of the M9. Leaving aside the video recording, the main difference is the simplified menu of the 262 v the live view of the 240. It was that feeling that having less kit would do me good This became the excuse I needed to change up to the M10. Im used to focus peaking from shooting video with the Sony cameras, so it was such a short leap to press the LV button and take photos in a way that felt familiar. A microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized microphones. Can you advice,please, if you still own both cameras: why some people says that m262 perform better colors? what a great text, and great pictures, thank you! When I was looking at replacing my M9 with a newer model which I did in large part for the benefit of a better screen on the back I chose to skip the Leica M240 due to the fact that I didnt feel like the swathe of features it had compared to the later M262 offered me any advantage. Menu. There are two things to be separated here. The use of a CMOS sensor allowed Leica to include two key features that the previous M9 didnt have. great output, but cant get a shot off faster than with the M8. Its still inaccurate, but at least the photos look pleasant enough. The build quality of the M 262 is impeccable. . By Exphotog, A Love Affair With The Leica M-D 262 by Ong Sien Hong - 35mmc, Initial experiments with a Leica M10-P and a Nikon 35mm 2.8 PC Shift Lens - 35mmc, (Mis)adventures with a Minolta Himatic 7s - By Matt Evans, 5 Frames with the new Voigtlander Color-Skopar Vintage Line 21mm f/3.5 By John Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. My GAS was satisfied with a Z6 with the M-to-Z adapter. The settings I use (format and manual or auto lens designation) pop up first on the main menu and with 2 clicks both actions are completed. Now, Im writing this after my M262 has come back from Germany (it only took a couple of months!! The Leica M [typ 240] (or M240 for short) was the first Leica to adopt the odd naming convention that broke away from the M# convention of yore. The Leica M [typ 262], or M262 for short offers what's best described as a stripped-back user interface. ), and Im now looking to part with the Leica M240 and put the money back into my business (where I borrowed it from). I know this is an old article but so what, I m commenting anyways. The M262 was not available when I bought my my M240 but if I was buying now I would still go for the M240. As I said at the end of that post, I then found myself in with a big chuck of the dreaded GAS. We were shooting inside a large carpet manufacturers in Kidderminster and I was trying to get some slightly abstract well timed shots of the various goings on in the factory. As John said it beforeendless upgrades, hours to spend to edit files, digital, you take even more picturesthe iso dial is nice, but I prefer (for the sake of creativity versus being too convenient) Film and stick to my a la carte M7 with one lensecalms down your mind. Resolution is an essential indicator of a screen's image quality, representing the maximum amount of pixels that can be shown on the screen. Im really enjoying this site since discovering it! I need a new 50mm lens. And given the choice between keeping the M262 and the M240, despite what the Leica M240 brings to the table, it doesnt win out over M262. Whilst I fully get that it is down to personal preference, I just thought I would ask the question: M240 (or its E and P variants) or M262? The M240 is a bit slow on the uptake, but I generally leave the camera on while on photo walks so not a real issue.Lock-ups. The view taken by some Leica users when the M240 was released was that features like live-view and video had no place on a Leica. Limited to 75 - 35/28mm. There is a slight sense that this camera isnt a major model it feels a tiny bit like theres a few too many buttons, and that the body of the camera is a little hollow, but in practice these things go unnoticed. It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M rangefinder, and the first to use a CMOS type sensor. The M10 is akin in size to an M6TTL and this is a benefit. Verified purchase: Yes | Condition . This is the reason I was so keen not to be without one for a few months so when the M240 didnt initially seem all that different to the M262 I was really pleased!if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_12',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); This relief quickly turned to intrigue. I would say a hidden gem at 2/3 of the price for a used M-10. With a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most headphones. To begin with, I tried put the idea to the back of my mind, then one day I opened the cupboard a saw my Monochrom sat there looking underused. https://www.dailycameranews.com/, ShakeSphere Portable Blender E-Lid review, Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 Review: A Solid but Unremarkable Upgrade. I love the M240, didn't feel to switch to the M10. As the cameras are meant to have identical sensors, do we think this is just new owner's biased impressions (nothing wrong with that btw) is could there be something in this? This happens with the M240 from time to time. The M9 was a simple digital rangefinder with limited features and menu options, the M262 has even less in the menu and a slightly improved user interface. The only shortcoming relating to the auto ISO function is that sometimes I feel like Id like to be able to see the ISO the camera is choosing on a shot by shot basis. In fact, there was a time when I swore I didnt need anything more. With its excellent dynamic range, beautiful colors, and compact design, it won a lot of fans, but perhaps not . The new Leica M is the most innovative and versatile M-Camera that the modern M-System has ever created. But, when my M262 needed to go to German camera hospital for what I guessed might be a significant amount of time (as is often the case), I figured I had little to loose trying out an M240 for a few weeks/months. Ive tried all of the digital M types and my heartfelt favorites are the M8 and M9-P (equally), then the Typ 262 in that order. In my view the lens in use IS much more important than a bit colour differences M240/M262/other Ms. I like to put my camera to my eye this live-view lark just doesnt appeal to me was the sort of sentence I likely uttered. Best wishes to you all and thanks again for your help. "MM-P""" Leica M Typ240MM-P Typ240 Find a comparison between different fujifilm x30 vs x100t. BECOME A MEMBER to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMbqwh98qO5wWowtQjIK8ig/joinEXCLUSIVE PRESETS FOR IMAGES CAPTURED WITH LEICA CAMERAS:. Having run the gamut of all the Ms, Ive settled on these two as my main M system and I suggest to others who cant shake the M bug to do something similar. Is the 262 different in this regard? A few years later I sold all my Nikon DLSR kit and switched to Sony full frame A7 cameras and began to realise just how useful it can be. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. I have used many rangefinders, a Leica M8, M9 (and its variants M-E/M9P/MM), M262, M240P and of course most recently the M-D 262. Compared to the M9 Ive found less of a problem with magenta shift, especially in skin tones, though its fair to say the bias is still toward magenta as opposed the the green bias I found in my Sonys especially the older and cheapest ones that had frankly horrible colour-science. Didnt have the budget to stretch to a Summilux/Summicron/ Summarit. Quality over quantity. Leica m240 sony a7sii . I currently shoot with a Fuji X-Pro2 and love it. In short, getting two cameras- a classic and a modern type, solves the damnable inadequacy issue that arises in all of us when you own just one type. All features aside, my lust was triggered by the drastic reduction in size. For example, I have seen an as new M240 from a Leica Store for 2,495 and a Voigtlander Ultron 50mm for c.700. : very useful. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. It depends on your needs. The upgrade to the M10 feels like its based on some fairly thin justifications, though I suspect (hope) that in practice just like swapping from M9 to M262 I will be pleasantly surprised by the fact that I find it brings more to the table than I expected. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. I shoot with 35mm and 50mm lenses. It seemed it was not much larger than an M7; that, alone, was enough to make me decide I would own one someday. I have one for the M240 and dont use it that much but at times it helps with critical focus. So I am very glad I got the 240 version. The M10 is also very slightly lighter than the M240. The Leica M10 's physical controls are logical, simple, and offer the right amount of resistance. I think, at least, Ive not tried one either . A phase-detection autofocus system is faster than a contrast detection autofocus system. A series of photographs taken from the same position over a long period is joined together to create a short video. It does make me wonder if they could have slimmed down this body like the M10, were they to have released this camera as a major upgrade rather than a stripped-back sidestep from the M240. I currently own a 262. (Leica M Typ 240), Nikon D850 + Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR, Canon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, Sony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS, Sony a6600 + Sony E 18-135mm F3__5-5__6 OSS, Sony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 28-70mm f/3__5-5__6 OSS, Canon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM. In fact, for this very reason the Leica M262 has actually presented me with the least inspiration so far. Functionalism be damned. That said, I do miss the live view feature. Keep forgetting about that. This made me think; maybe I could get on with the video features too? Its a good thing to have for visually challenged oldsters like me. Yes!! In case you're confused, the M240 was the camera that followed the Leica M9. M240 v. M246 v. M262 v. Monochrom 246. On same first menus screen can have File Format to pick DNG or DNG+JPG or JPG only.When you get the M10 Ill be interested to hear how you like the B&W jpg vs. your Monochrome. Or pictures are completely similar? This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash. All the added features that the M240 brought to the table didnt really appeal to me, and specifically because I didnt think I was interested in live view, I felt that all the M10 could offer me was an ISO dial. To each his own, indeed!Ive never seen one in real life mad to think Ive ordered a camera of that value without handling it. The controls are easy to change while the camera is at your eye. At which point I bought a stand-in M240 and I discovered the joys of live view on an m-mount Leica. I like Roger a lot hes written for this site before, and we chatted a fair bit around the time. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. A higher megapixel count means that the camera is capable of capturing more details. High quality battery charger is a handy companion for digital shooting. It then required a short trip to camera-hospital in Germany. Im not trying to justify myself I certainly wouldnt to trolls the point is simply that I spend my money on something I enjoy. That breaks the rules by my measure, unfortunately . Ive decided to sell my Leica M typ 262, so I thought it about time I write a bit of a post about it. The thing is, I much prefer the warm display on the M262. As I talk about in my M9 review, the screen on that camera really is very crap, so this did feel like a big enough deal to make the jump. By BTW the battery life of a charge is awesome. But nope, they included a hardly useful flourish, that as you say, looks like it was thought up but a marketing department. I am very pleased to be in a forum withso many helpful people. The colour differences between the two are due to slightly different colour handling in the camera and can be cancelled out completely by the camera profiles in LR. Literally. And sometimes they could come in handy. There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. Water-resistant devices can resist the penetration of water, such as powerful water jets, but not being submerged into water. 20% better video recording quality (main camera), Has continuous autofocus when recording movies, has continuous autofocus when recording movies. The Leica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than the M Typ 240. I bought it as temporary replacement camera after my M262 had to pay a little trip to Germany for some repair work.